Inclusive Learning: The resilience dilemma in inclusive education
There is a quiet paradox at the heart of modern inclusion: our mission is to remove barriers for neurodivergent learners, yet the world beyond the school gates remains full of them.
In Huh! SEND, Ben Newark argues that education has fallen into a medicalised view of special educational needs, the idea that if we simply remove enough obstacles, every student will perform like their neurotypical peers. Give glasses, and they see; remove the barrier, and they adapt.
But whole-school events, from Sports Day to residential trips, force us to confront a much more delicate balance. If our ultimate goal is to prepare young people for life after school, when does removing every barrier turn into removing their opportunity to build resilience in a safe environment?
The Sports Day dilemma
This June, on Sports Day, one of our learners with ASC was really struggling. He sat on the floor, tears rolling down his cheeks, gently stimming. His friends had noticed and were offering quiet support. I sat alongside him to check in. I used very few words, offering reassurance simply through my presence. He said that he would be okay in a minute several times, so we sat in silence until that ‘minute’ passed.
When he was ready, he stood up and walked toward the track events on the far side of the field, but I could tell he was still unsettled. I followed at a distance, every instinct screaming at me to intervene, to rescue him, to pull him away from the noise, the heat, and the overwhelming sensory burden. Instead, I watched as his friends sat alongside him, not speaking, but offering an anchor of quiet support while he continued to stim.
I approached our Emotional Literacy Support Assistant (ELSA) to share what was happening and build a plan. I was anxious to 'fix' the situation and remove the obstacles. However, our ELSA offered a grounding perspective: it is precisely these safe, protected, yet challenging environments that prepare our young people for a world that will inevitably be noisy, hot, and unpredictable.
We watched together as he worked through the overwhelm, supported subtly by his peers and monitored closely by us. When he was ready, he stood up and competed in the 400m, 200m, and 100m races. I watched with relief and quiet awe, fully understanding what our ELSA had meant.
Relational practice
There is a fine line here. Without intentional planning, psychological safety, and robust support, this moment could have unfolded very differently, and potentially destructively.
The student succeeded because he was known. He was surrounded by peers who understood him, and supported by me, our full time ELSA, and our SENDCo, watching closely. Furthermore, our Head of Sport had intentionally designed an inclusive day with varied activities, seeking to ensure every student could contribute. We invested the time and resources to view the entire event through an inclusive lens.
Our mission is to reduce barriers, but we cannot, and should not, aim to eliminate them all, all of the time. Our responsibility is equally to prepare young people for life after school.
Navigating the impact of challenge
This is delicate, complex work. The longer I work alongside students with ASC, the clearer it becomes that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to balancing challenge and support.
An unpredictable, overstimulating day can severely impact a student’s ability to cope that evening, the following day, or for the rest of the week. Unmanaged dysregulation directly contributes to school avoidance and burnout. To avoid this, we must mitigate Autistic Burnout by planning rigorously and collaborating closely with students and their families to calibrate the right level of stretch.
The role of communication
Giving families and students time to adjust to changes in routine is critical. For many families of neurodivergent children, high-profile school events trigger immense anxiety; they have seen what happens when the balance between challenge and support fails. They are the ones who manage the meltdowns and physical exhaustion at the end of the day. You cannot over-communicate with families, reassurance about the planning behind an event builds essential trust.
Internal communication is just as vital. A whole-school approach requires establishing clear timelines, roles, and contingency plans long in advance. Collaborating across departments ensures that if a student cannot access a specific activity, they still enjoy a high-quality parallel experience.
Crucially, this must not fall solely on the SENDCo; inclusion relies on distributed leadership and shared responsibility across all staff. To make this operational, schools must ask:
Ownership: Who takes responsibility for ensuring communication is timely, thorough, and consistent?
Student voice: Who actively gathers and integrates student feedback during the planning stage?
Direct engagement: Who communicates the plan directly to students so they feel prepared and safe?
A framework for inclusive practice
Underpinning inclusive event planning with Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles transforms inclusion from a reactive to proactive design strategy. Rather than making ad-hoc adaptations on the day, UDL asks us to anticipate sensory, emotional, and social barriers from the outset:
Multiple Means of Engagement (The 'Why'): Why should students participate, and how do we foster genuine buy-in?
Not every student is motivated by competition or large crowds. Engagement means offering choices, such as non-competitive physical activities, officiating roles, quiet support spaces, or media/photography teams, so every young person finds meaningful purpose in the event without feeling sidelined.
Multiple Means of Representation (The 'What'): How is information about the event communicated and structured?
Uncertainty fuels anxiety. Providing visual schedules, photo guides of event spaces, maps of quiet zones, and social stories weeks in advance demystifies the day. Clear, predictable communication helps neurodivergent students construct a mental map of what to expect, significantly reducing cognitive and sensory overload.
Multiple Means of Action & Expression (The 'How'): How can students demonstrate participation and success?
Success shouldn't have a single look. Allowing flexible forms of participation, whether that means running a shorter track distance, wearing non-standard sensory-friendly kit, taking planned sensory breaks, or contributing through peer support, ensures all students can experience genuine achievement on their own terms.
Aspiration and safe stretch
The DfE report on School Belonging highlights that high ambitions are essential for all children. When students participate in a broad range of experiences where they can see themselves succeed, their confidence grows, motivating them to tackle future challenges. These positive experiences directly shape their self-belief, future aspirations, and career goals.
Ultimately, striking the right balance between challenge and support requires intentionality across five key pillars:
Relational knowledge: Knowing the child deeply, their triggers, strengths, and subtle cues.
Psychological safety: Ensuring the student knows they are supported, even when overwhelmed.
Proactive planning: Embedding UDL principles and contingency options into event design.
Transparent communication: Partnering closely with staff, students, and anxious families.
Uncompromising aspiration: Refusing to let inclusion mean lowering our expectations for what young people can achieve.
I am not saying any of this is easy. It is time-consuming, deliberate, and often exhausting work. However, the investment is entirely worth the outcome. When a parent tells you that just two years ago their child couldn't even step inside a classroom, and you then watch that same young person thrive alongside their peers in a whole-school event, that is deeply significant. That is meaningful inclusion in action.
When we get this balance right, we do not simply protect neurodivergent learners from the world; we empower them to navigate it.
Comments